- Downtown Bucharest
- +40 745 77 77 75
- contact@infradandb.com
European Commission proposal adopted 9 September 2026 On 9 September the European Commission adopted a proposal for a new Public Procurement Regulation — a single, directly applicable instrument intended to replace Directives 2014/23/EU, 2014/24/EU and 2014/25/EU, together with procurement provisions currently scattered across sector-specific legislation. Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné described the move from three directives to one regulation as a radical simplification. The Commission projects annual administrative savings of EUR 649 million — EUR 80 million for public buyers and EUR 570 million for economic operators. Public procurement accounts for roughly 15% of EU GDP, around EUR 2.5 trillion in 2025. Reporting on the proposal notes the rulebook would shrink from roughly 900 pages to about 200. The proposal now goes to the European Parliament and the Council. Nothing changes yet, and I would not put a date on when it will. Files of this scale typically take years, and the text that eventually enters into force is rarely the text that entered negotiation. But the direction of travel matters now, because it determines what is worth building capability around. The single word that matters: Regulation For anyone working in Romanian procurement, the most consequential feature of this proposal is not any individual rule. It is the instrument. Romania’s current framework — Law 98/2016 for classic procurement, Law 99/2016 for sectoral, Law 100/2016 for concessions — exists because directives require national transposition. Each Member State transposes in its own way, adds its own requirements, and produces its own body of interpretation and guidance. A Regulation applies directly. No transposition. No national variation in the core rules. Substantially less room for what the Commission’s own analysis calls divergent national transposition choices — and what the industry calls gold-plating. If you have ever explained to a foreign client why a Romanian procedure requires something their home market does not, despite both flowing from the same directive, you already understand what this proposal is aimed at. What the proposal actually contains Simpler and clearer rules Three procedures instead of five. Consolidation into one instrument, with procurement provisions currently dispersed across sector-specific legislation brought into a single coherent framework. Negotiation becomes normal. The proposal gives public buyers greater flexibility to negotiate with applicants during procedures, encourages market consultation, and explicitly aims to make public procurement more like private procurement. That last phrase deserves attention. In current Romanian practice, negotiation is the exception and clarification is tightly bounded. A framework that normalises negotiation changes not just the rules but the skill set required to bid. A new innovation procedure for developing and acquiring solutions not yet available on the market. One digital marketplace across the EU The proposal creates an integrated digital procurement marketplace built from interconnected, interoperable Member State eProcurement platforms. Three practical consequences: For a foreign contractor, this is the most commercially significant element in the entire package. Today, bidding in Romania means registering in SEAP, obtaining a Romanian qualified electronic signature, and assembling a documentation set in Romanian. Under the proposed architecture, an operator registered on any connected platform could bid into Romanian procedures. That lowers the entry cost to the Romanian market considerably. It also raises the number of bidders any Romanian contractor will face. Best Price-Quality Ratio becomes the standard This is the change with the most direct effect on how offers are built. BPQR becomes the standard award method, with quality criteria accounting for at least 30% of the award criteria — 50% for labour-intensive contracts — subject to a comply-or-explain mechanism. A contracting authority may deviate, but must explain how quality will otherwise be ensured, for instance through minimum quality requirements. Public buyers will have to systematically consider not only price but quality, including environmental, social, innovation, security and resilience, and European preference considerations. They retain full discretion over which quality criteria to apply and in what proportion. Romanian practice already moves in this direction — the procedures I have analysed recently allocate 50%, 60%, even 70% of the score to technical factors. A 30% floor would formalise a trend rather than reverse one. But it would end the lowest-price procedure as a default option for a large share of contracts. Security, resilience and European preference Following the Draghi and Letta reports, the proposal reflects the geopolitical dimension of procurement. It enables, and in some cases requires, public buyers to address risks relating to security and public safety, sensitive information, cybersecurity, and undue third-country influence. New provisions on resilience and security of supply would apply to contracts involving entities linked to critical infrastructure, supporting supply chain diversification and crisis preparedness. The Regulation introduces a horizontal European preference framework, clarifying which operators and products are covered by the Union’s international procurement commitments. The Commission would be able to restrict that coverage where a market access analysis establishes that a third country has failed to grant EU operators fair access, or where restrictions are needed to avoid security-of-supply dependencies. Press reporting indicates the framework would allow authorities to exclude bids with less than 50% European content by value, and that the measures stop short of a blanket “Buy European” requirement. That threshold comes from reporting rather than from the Commission’s own press release — worth verifying against the legal text before relying on it. What this means in Romania specifically Four observations, offered as reasoning rather than prediction. 1. The competitive advantage of knowing national quirks would erode. Part of the value of a Romanian procurement adviser today lies in knowing how Romanian authorities interpret and apply rules that originate in Brussels but arrive filtered through Law 98/2016, ANAP guidance, CNSC decisions and local habit. A directly applicable Regulation compresses that filter. I say this as someone whose business is built partly on that knowledge. The honest read is that harmonisation moves the value from knowing local rules toward understanding the market, the authorities and the competition — which is the harder and more durable half anyway. 2. Romanian contractors would face more foreign competition, sooner. The once-only principle
Government Decision adopted Thursday, 3 September 2026 The Romanian Government has approved the technical-economic indicators for the rehabilitation and modernisation of DN 73C between Tigveni and Râmnicu Vâlcea, clearing the final administrative step before CNAIR can launch the works tender. The official designation in the Government Decision is “Rehabilitation/modernisation of DN 73C, km 55+000 – km 68+000, Tigveni – Municipality of Râmnicu Vâlcea (Lot 2)”, covering Argeș and Vâlcea counties. In infrastructure press it is commonly referred to as “Lot 6” of the Sibiu–Pitești motorway, though the works are not a motorway section in the strict sense. Total investment: RON 769.017 million including VAT, at March 2025 prices. The figures in euro Converted at the rate you asked me to apply, 5.2 RON = 1 EUR: Item RON (incl. VAT) EUR (approx.) Total investment 769,017,000 147.9 million Construction and assembly works (C+M) 652,006,000 125.4 million Year 1 — total 500,000,000 96.2 million Year 1 — C+M 400,000,000 76.9 million Year 2 — total 269,017,000 51.7 million Year 2 — C+M 252,006,000 48.5 million Two cautions on these numbers. First, 5.2 is a working conversion rate, not the official BNR rate — for any bid calculation, use the rate specified in the tender documentation, which will normally be the BNR rate at a defined reference date. Second, and more importantly for pricing: all figures above include VAT. Romanian tender values are published exclusive of VAT, so the contract value that eventually appears in SEAP will be materially lower than RON 769 million. Beneficiary: CNAIR (National Company for Road Infrastructure Administration). Principal credit officer: Ministry of Transport and Infrastructure. Execution period: 14 months. Funding: non-reimbursable external funds through the Transport Programme 2021–2027, the state budget via the Ministry of Transport, and other legally constituted sources. The project sits under Priority 2 of the Transport Programme, covering improvement of secondary road connectivity. Why this road, and why now DN 73C is currently a degraded national road with an 8-metre platform: a 6-metre carriageway and two 1-metre shoulders. The driver is the A1 Sibiu–Pitești motorway. When the Curtea de Argeș – Tigveni section — built by the Austrian contractor PORR — opens to traffic, vehicles arriving at the Tigveni interchange will need an adequate road connection towards Râmnicu Vâlcea. The justification note frames this as ensuring the absorption and smooth flow of a share of the major road traffic that will shift onto this section once the Sibiu–Pitești corridor develops. In other words, this is not a standalone road upgrade. It is the piece that makes a motorway opening functional. Scope of works The national road The DN 73C platform will be widened from 8 metres to between 9.00 and 12.50 metres, with two 3.5-metre traffic lanes, edge strips and shoulders. On two sections where the traffic study found heavy vehicles exceeding 20% and gradients of at least 4%, additional slow-vehicle lanes will be built — one of 770 metres, the other of 1.18 kilometres. On those stretches the road will carry three lanes. Also included: three roundabouts (at the DN 73C junction with DJ 678A near Ciofrângeni, at the junction with DN 7, and where the link road meets DJ 678A and DC 239), six bus stops, and pavements through built-up areas. Drainage works comprise 35 P2-type culverts and seven D5-type culverts on DN 73C, plus a further four on the link road. The new 2.39 km link road A new 2.39-kilometre link road will connect DN 73C to the A1 at the Tigveni interchange. The alignment was selected after two stages of multi-criteria analysis, with the objective of discharging motorway traffic into DN 73C without routing transit traffic through the built-up area of Tigveni. Roughly 600 metres of DJ 678A will also be rehabilitated to complete the connection. The link road platform is substantially wider at 19.5 metres, with two lanes in each direction and a median. Lighting is specified for the roundabouts, for both bridges over the Topolog river, and for the parking area at km 55+600. Seven structures, including a 410-metre bridge The project includes seven engineering structures: two existing DN 73C bridges rehabilitated, two underpasses and two bridges built on the link road, and the existing DJ 678A bridge replaced. The principal structure is a new 410-metre bridge over the Topolog river on the link road, with eight spans, carrying four traffic lanes — two in each direction — plus two footways. A second new Topolog crossing at km 2+245 will be 170.5 metres long with three spans. The rehabilitation works cover the existing DN 73C bridges over the Bădislava and Sâmnic rivers, and replacement of a DJ 678A bridge described as severely degraded. Land acquisition Total land occupation required: 302,037 square metres, of which approximately 210,760 m² are estimated as requiring expropriation. Works will run across both public and private land, in Argeș and Vâlcea counties, within and outside the built-up areas of the Tigveni, Ciofrângeni and Golești administrative units. What this means commercially A tender is now the next step. The Government Decision on technical-economic indicators is the administrative gate that precedes procurement. With it adopted, CNAIR can launch the acquisition procedure for the works. I would not put a date on that launch. The interval between indicator approval and notice publication varies substantially between CNAIR projects and depends on factors not visible from outside. Anyone quoting you a firm timeline is estimating. The 14-month execution period is short for this scope. Thirteen and a half kilometres of national road widening, a 2.39 km dual-carriageway link road, seven structures including a 410-metre eight-span bridge, three roundabouts, and 46 culverts — in 14 months. Read alongside the two-year financial phasing, with RON 400 million of C+M in year one, the implied production rate is demanding. That has direct consequences for plant mobilisation, for the number of simultaneous work fronts, and for how a bidder builds a credible programme. The bridge is the critical path. A 410-metre, eight-span crossing of the Topolog is the single element most likely
Contracting authority: Municipality of Iași | Notice reference: 4541580/2026/54333 | Fiche published 2 September 2026 The Municipality of Iași has opened an EU-funded procedure for the supply of 10 new trams of approximately 22 metres, under the project “Purchase of new trams – Purchase of public transport vehicles – 22 m trams for the Municipality of Iași”, SMIS code 354270. This is a supply contract, single lot, with a duration of 30 months. Main CPV code: 34622100-4 – Tramway coaches. Estimated value: RON 125,600,000 excluding VAT. Unlike most Romanian infrastructure procedures, this one is financed from EU funds — through the North-East Regional Programme 2021–2027, Priority 4 (a more sustainable urban mobility region), Specific Objective 2.8 on sustainable multimodal urban mobility. That funding source matters, and I return to it at the end. What is being bought Ten unidirectional trams with fully low floors, fitted with ITS equipment, intended to renew the existing fleet. The stated rationale runs through reduced carbon emissions, lower noise pollution, reduced energy consumption, and improved accessibility for wheelchair users, elderly passengers, people with visual or hearing impairments, and passengers with pushchairs. The 22-metre maximum length was justified through an opportunity study annexed to the financing application. The scoring grid: price is half, but the other half is where offers are won and lost Award is on best price-quality ratio: Evaluation factor Weight Max points Offer price 50% 50 Extended warranty period 20% 20 Additional seated passengers 10% 10 Autonomous running distance 10% 10 Traction energy consumption 10% 10 Total 100 Price is scored proportionally: P(n) = (lowest price offered / price n) × 50. At 50%, price carries more weight here than in most Romanian works procedures. But the four technical factors are unusual in a specific way: each has a hard conformity threshold beneath which the offer is rejected outright, and a ceiling above which extra performance earns nothing. That structure rewards precise targeting rather than maximum specification. Overshooting costs money and earns zero additional points. Extended warranty — 20 points, the largest technical factor The baseline required by the terms of reference is 350,000 km or 5 years, whichever comes first, from entry into service, covering the tram as a whole and all its components. Scoring is proportional: Pwarranty(n) = warranty(n) × 20 / highest warranty offered. Two conversion rules matter here. Warranties expressed in kilometres convert at 1 year = 70,000 km, and must be offered in multiples of 70,000 km. Where a warranty is stated in both years and kilometres, the years figure governs the evaluation. The bidder must also calculate on an assumed average annual mileage of 70,000 km per tram. Traction energy consumption — 10 points, and a documentary trap The mandatory ceiling is 1.9 kWh/km under e-SORT 2 test conditions. Above that, the offer is rejected. At exactly 1.9 kWh/km, zero points. Scoring: P(n) = (lowest consumption offered / consumption n) × 10. The documentary requirement is where this factor gets demanding. The offer must contain e-SORT 2 test sheets for the trams offered, attested by an accredited body, with authorised Romanian translation. And the value used for evaluation is not the average of the three SORT 2 cycle tests — it is the worst result, the highest kWh/km recorded across the three runs. For a manufacturer whose test documentation shows a favourable average but a variable spread, this rule alone can cost points. Autonomous running distance — 10 points The tram must be capable of running independently of the overhead contact network. Below 200 m, or with no autonomous capability at all, the offer is non-compliant. At exactly 200 m, zero points. The formula: P(offer) = (D(offer) − 200) / (2000 − 200) × 10 Anything beyond 2,000 m still scores 10 points — so 2,000 m is the efficient target, not the maximum the vehicle can technically achieve. The bidder must submit a declaration accompanied by a calculation demonstrating that the onboard energy unit actually supports the offered distance under real traffic conditions (e-SORT 2), not under theoretical conditions. Additional seated passengers — 10 points Minimum capacity is 30 fixed, non-folding seats, of which at least 5 accessible from the low floor. Below 30 seats, the offer is non-compliant. At exactly 30, zero points. The scored range is 1 to 10 additional seats; beyond 10, no further points. Additional seating must still respect minimum total passenger capacity, minimum standing capacity, minimum seat pitch, and UNECE R 107. Qualification requirements: notably light This is the part that will surprise contractors used to Romanian works procedures. Similar experience: supply of similar products in a cumulative value of at least RON 125,000,000 excluding VAT over the last 3 years, across one or more contracts. Similar products are defined as a rail-guided road vehicle intended for transport, or products of the same nature and complexity, or superior. Economic and financial capacity: the fiche contains no turnover requirement and no liquidity ratio. Section III.1.2 is present but sets no threshold. Quality and environmental standards: Section III.1.3.b is empty. No ISO 9001 or ISO 14001 requirement. Personnel: no named specialists required. Section III.2.3 confirms the obligation to state employee names and qualifications does not apply. Compared to the works procedures running in Romania at similar values — which routinely demand turnover of one and a half to two times contract value, liquidity ratios tested year by year, and dedicated cash flow — the qualification burden here is light. The filter in this procedure is not financial standing. It is whether you manufacture a compliant tram and can document it. Guarantees and administrative terms Clarification requests may be submitted up to 18 days before the submission deadline; the authority will respond on the 11th day before it. The submission deadline is not stated in the fiche itself. It appears in the contract notice in SEAP. Anyone working to this procedure should take the date from there rather than from any secondary source, including this article. Price adjustment Adjustment applies only from the
Contracting authority: Sector 1 of the Municipality of Bucharest | Reference: 4505359_2026_PAAPD1614338 | Corrigendum published in the EU Official Journal, 2 September 2026 Sector 1 of Bucharest has tendered the design and construction of Object no. 2 of the “PROMENADA VERDE” investment objective — the renovation, rehabilitation and consolidation of the banks of Lake Grivița. The notice examined here is a corrigendum, not the original contract notice. It was transmitted on 1 September 2026 and published the following day. Its stated reason is “update-add — information update”, and it changes three things: The submission deadline is now 14 September 2026 at 15:00, with tender opening the same day at the same hour, in SEAP, before the members of the evaluation committee. If you were working to an earlier date, that date is superseded. And a corrigendum that moves a deadline forward compresses whatever preparation time remained — worth checking against your own calendar immediately. Scope and value The contract covers design services (technical design and execution details), technical quality verification of the design, technical assistance during execution, and the construction works themselves. It is an open procedure with a duration of 48 months. Estimated value: RON 269,090,089. Main CPV code: 45246200 – River bank protection works. The full CPV set is unusually broad, spanning hydrotechnical works, bridge and footbridge construction, road works, electrical installations, utility networks, landscaping and planting, and design services — which tells you something about the range of capability required. The physical indicators The approved performance indicators, drawn from the feasibility study under Article 7 of Government Decision 907/2016: Indicator Quantity Total intervention area 867,885.52 m² — Water surface 764,618.12 m² — Green spaces 45,611.40 m² — Total promenade area (on ground and over water) 57,656.00 m² Total promenade length 8,409.00 m — Pedestrian footbridges 231 m — Promenade on ground 2,350.00 m — Promenade over water 5,828.00 m Roughly 5.8 kilometres of the promenade is built over open water. That single figure defines the technical character of this contract more than any other. The stated condition of the existing bank defences is degradation, in places severely advanced, caused by environmental action — precipitation, groundwater circulation, freeze-thaw cycling, meteoric water — compounded by the absence of regular maintenance across the structure’s service life. The scoring grid: personnel experience carries 40 points Award is on best price-quality ratio, with total score calculated as F1 + F2 + F3 + F4: Factor Weight F1 — Offer price 40 F2 — Professional experience of key personnel (sum of 8 sub-factors) 40 F2.1 — Contract Manager / Coordinator 5 F2.2 — Hydrotechnical construction and works design engineer (design team coordinator) 5 F2.3 — Architect 5 F2.4 — Railways, roads and bridges structural design engineer 5 F2.5 — Building structural design engineer 5 F2.6 — Utility networks design engineer 5 F2.7 — Electrical installations design engineer 5 F2.8 — Site manager / works manager 5 F3 — Methodology and resource planning 10 F4 — Extended warranty period 10 Total 100 This distribution is the defining feature of the procedure. Forty points — the same weight as price — depend entirely on the CVs of eight named individuals. Sub-factor F2.1 illustrates the pattern: points are awarded for having held the position of Contract Manager, Coordinator or Technical Director on contracts involving execution and/or design-and-build works falling within the category of hydrotechnical works for bank stabilisation, rehabilitation and protection, and promenades, executed to importance category C or above under Government Decision 766/1997. A minimum of 3 such contracts scores 2 points, 4 contracts scores 3, and so on up the scale. The specificity is the point. This is not “a bridge engineer” — it is a design engineer with documented hydrotechnical bank-protection experience at category C. Multiply that across eight positions and the practical question becomes whether you can assemble and evidence the full team, not whether you can build the works. F4 — extended warranty: the minimum accepted is 36 months. Below that, non-compliant. At exactly 36 months, zero points. The highest warranty offered scores 10, with others proportional: P2(n) = (Gn / Gmax) × 10. Qualification requirements Turnover. Average annual turnover over 2023, 2024 and 2025 of at least RON 200,000,000, or the equivalent in another currency at the BNR average rate for the relevant year. In a joint bid, this may be met cumulatively by the members of the consortium. Similar experience — works. Works completed in the last 5 years on construction, consolidation, modernisation, rehabilitation or extension of structures of importance category C or higher under Government Decision 766/1997, across a maximum of 8 contracts, with a cumulative value of at least RON 200,000,000. Critically, at least one of those contracts must fall within the category of hydrotechnical works serving reservoir, recreational and/or tourist lakes. Similar experience — design. Design services completed in the last 5 years for the same category of structures, across a maximum of 3 contracts, cumulative value at least RON 3,000,000 — again with at least one contract in the hydrotechnical lake category. That single mandatory reference, on both the works and the design side, is the narrowest gate in the procedure. RON 200 million of general category C construction is achievable for many contractors. One documented lake-related hydrotechnical contract is not. Plant and equipment. The required fleet is specific and revealing: The sheet-pile driver, the long-reach excavator, the Ø800 mm piling rig and four large motor pumps are not general civil works equipment. They describe working at and below a waterline. Access may be through ownership, rental, loan-for-use, leasing or service contract, and in a consortium the requirement is met by pooling members’ resources. What the equipment list tells you that the scope statement does not Read the fleet requirement alongside the 5,828 metres of promenade over water and the picture resolves: this is a piling contract with a landscaping programme attached, not a park refurbishment with some waterfront. Sheet piling, Ø800 mm bored piles, long-reach excavation and heavy dewatering capacity are the core
Neither of the two developments below is a tender. Nothing has been published in SEAP. There is no deadline to meet, no documentation to download, no bid bond to arrange. That is precisely why they matter. By the time a Romanian infrastructure tender appears in SEAP, the qualification thresholds are fixed and the clock is running — typically 35 to 50 days to submission for works procedures of this scale. Turnover history cannot be changed in that window. Similar experience cannot be acquired. A consortium partner cannot be found, vetted, and contracted. What can be done in that window is writing, pricing, and assembling documents you already possess. Everything else has to happen before. Two events in the last week tell you what to prepare for. Signal 1: Four road projects cleared the Interministerial Council On Thursday, 27 August 2026, the Interministerial Council for the approval of public investments (Consiliul Interministerial de avizare a investițiilor publice) issued favourable opinions on four road infrastructure projects. The announcement was made publicly by the Ministry of Transport and Infrastructure. The four projects: Project Scope Brașov – Făgăraș motorway 49.3 km of motorway, relieving the existing national road Bucharest – Alexandria motorway High-speed link between the capital and the south of the country DR1 – Vest Expres ~10 km radial road extending Bulevardul Timișoara to the A0 ring motorway at Domnești Sibiu South Bypass Over 21 km of new road, removing transit traffic from the southern part of the city DR1 – Vest Expres carries additional significance beyond its own length. It is the first radial road of the Orbital București programme — a planned network of ten radial roads connecting the city’s major boulevards to the ring road and the motorway network. One project has now cleared its first hurdle. Nine remain behind it. What this approval actually means — and what it does not The Interministerial Council opinion is an administrative milestone, not a procurement event. Two steps remain before anything reaches the market: I cannot give you a reliable estimate of how long step 1 takes. It varies substantially between projects and depends on factors that are not publicly visible from the outside. Anyone quoting you a firm number is guessing. What I can say with confidence is that the sequence itself is fixed, and that the contract values will only become public at step 1 — the Council opinion does not publish them. The practical read For a foreign contractor, four projects of this profile share a predictable qualification structure. Romanian motorway and expressway procedures at this scale routinely require: I want to be careful here: these are patterns observed across recent Romanian road procedures, not the published requirements of these four specific projects, which do not yet exist. Treat them as a planning hypothesis to test your position against, not as criteria to satisfy. The point is that every item on that list takes months to arrange and none of them can be arranged after a notice is published. Signal 2: Bucharest approves a EUR 500 million water and sewerage programme On Friday, 28 August 2026, the General Council of Bucharest (CGMB) approved an addendum to the concession contract between the Municipality of Bucharest and Apa Nova, establishing a new investment programme in water and sewerage infrastructure worth close to EUR 500 million. The scope According to Mayor Ciprian Ciucu, the programme covers interventions across 221 kilometres of water and sewerage networks, in all six districts of Bucharest. Two thirds of the programme is allocated to sewerage alone: The rationale is explicitly climate-driven. Roxana Ionescu, General Director of the Public Services Directorate, stated that changing precipitation patterns require the resizing of sewerage networks and the construction of retention basins where technically and financially feasible. Ciucu referenced recent flooding in the Parcul Carol area as evidence that the existing system no longer copes. The split that matters commercially The programme divides into two components: This distinction is not administrative trivia. It very likely determines which procurement regime applies to each contract, which in turn determines the rules, the remedies, and the timelines you will face. The municipal component would ordinarily fall under classic public procurement; the concessionaire component would ordinarily fall under the sectoral regime applicable to utilities. I say “very likely” and “ordinarily” deliberately. The actual allocation depends on the terms of the addendum, which I have not seen. Before committing resources to either component, confirm the applicable regime for the specific contract you are targeting. The difference affects your standstill periods, your challenge routes, and in some cases whether the procedure is published in SEAP at all. The funding is secured, which is unusual The addendum also includes a water tariff increase of 0.85 lei per cubic metre. Ciucu noted the resulting increase for a household is around 28 lei, and that Bucharest’s tariff remains the second lowest in the country. For a contractor, the tariff mechanism is the most important detail in the entire announcement. It means the programme is funded through a revenue stream rather than through annual budget allocations subject to political revision. Programmes financed this way have materially different cancellation and delay profiles from those dependent on yearly budget lines or on EU fund absorption deadlines. A further detail worth noting Ionescu stated that a specific objective is to coordinate the water and sewerage works with tramway modernisation and district heating works. Read commercially, that points toward bundled or sequenced urban works packages rather than isolated pipe-laying contracts — and toward a premium on contractors who can demonstrate traffic management, utility coordination, and urban site logistics capability, not merely pipeline installation. She also indicated that the current mandatory investment programme is around 66% implemented toward the end of 2026, with remaining projects at an advanced stage of maturity — which is what made a new programme opportune. What to do between now and the tenders The window between a pipeline signal and a published notice is the only period in which your qualification
Submission deadline: 1 October 2026 | Contract notice CN1095815 Administrația Străzilor București (the Bucharest Roads Authority) has launched an open tender procedure for “Design and works execution services for the investment objective «Strengthening/Rehabilitation of Pasajul Victoriei»”. It is one of the largest urban infrastructure procedures currently open in the Romanian capital and, given how it is structured, a contract accessible to only a limited number of economic operators. What is being tendered The contract is a design-and-build contract, awarded as a single lot, with a duration of 28 months. Main CPV code: 45221110-6 – Bridge construction work. The total estimated value is RON 138,101,175.82 excluding VAT, broken down as follows: Component Value (RON, excl. VAT) Construction and assembly works (C+M) 130,898,253.60 Plant and technological equipment (chapter 4.3) 1,650,000.00 Site organisation related costs 1,200,000.00 Design services 3,874,807.61 Technical assistance from the designer 478,114.61 Of the C+M value, RON 888,000.00 excluding VAT is allocated to construction works and installations related to site organisation. One element deserves particular attention: the amount of RON 27,385,221.12 excluding VAT representing miscellaneous and unforeseen costs is not included in the value of the contract being awarded. It is provided for in the general cost estimate (devizul general) and may be accessed later, as needed, through contract amendment under Article 221 of Law no. 98/2016. The technical basis of the procedure is a technical expert report prepared in 2023, establishing the current condition of the overpass. The tender documentation refers to the DALI (feasibility study for intervention works), version 2 as recommended by its author, and the technical proposal must demonstrate point-by-point correspondence with the solutions established in the DALI. The contract is not financed from European Union funds. Award criterion: 40% price, 60% technical component The award is made on the best price-quality ratio. The scoring structure is central to any bidder’s strategy: Evaluation factor Maximum score Offer price 40 Professional experience – Project Manager 10 Professional experience – Design Team Coordinator 5 Professional experience – Railways, Roads and Bridges design engineer 5 Organisation and methodology (4 sub-factors × 5 points) 20 Environmentally friendly plant and equipment 10 Social inclusion component 5 Use of BIM technology 5 Total 100 The price score is awarded proportionally: P(n) = (lowest offered price / price n) × 40. Three practical observations on this grid. First: 60 out of 100 points are technical, and 20 of them — the organisation and methodology factors — are awarded on the quality of the drafting of the technical proposal. The documentation explicitly warns that text copied from the terms of reference without further detail receives the minimum score (1 point out of 5 on each sub-factor). The difference between 4 and 20 points is made in the writing, not in actual technical capability. Second: the 10 points for environmentally friendly plant are won or lost on documents, not on promises. The maximum score requires a minimum of 5 electric or hybrid machines (5 points) and a minimum of 34 EURO 6 tipper trucks or concrete mixer trucks (5 points). Proof is provided through the fixed assets register, lease or loan-for-use agreements, and documents establishing the emission standard. For a bidder that does not already own the fleet, this is a partnering or contracting decision that must be taken early. Third: BIM is worth 5 points, but only at Level 2 — a coordinated model used both in design (including technical detailing) and in execution, updated as construction progresses. BIM in the design phase only is worth 2.5 points. The commitment becomes an integral part of the contract, and failure to honour it may trigger contractual penalties. The social inclusion component offers 5 points for employing three persons with disabilities or persons unemployed for more than 6 months, with proof to be submitted within a maximum of 10 days from notification of the procedure result. Qualification requirements: the real filter This is where it is decided who can bid and who cannot. Economic and financial capacity. The average global turnover for 2023, 2024 and 2025 must be at least RON 276,000,000 — roughly twice the contract value. In addition, the current ratio (current assets / current liabilities) must exceed 1.2 in each of the three years, not on average. The bidder ranked first must also demonstrate access to unencumbered financial resources of at least RON 50,000,000 excluding VAT, dedicated exclusively to this contract, for a period of 8 months from the works commencement order. Similar experience – works. Completion, within the last 5 years, of a similar construction under a contract of the same nature, or a maximum of 2 contracts, with a cumulative value of at least RON 130,000,000 excluding VAT. Similar works are defined as new construction, rehabilitation, modernisation or widening of urban streets, national roads, express roads or motorways, which included at least one bridge, overpass or viaduct. Similar experience – services. Design, within the last 3 years, of a similar construction, or a maximum of 3 contracts, with a cumulative value of at least RON 4,300,000 excluding VAT, for transport infrastructure construction which included at least one bridge, overpass or viaduct. Plant and equipment. The list is substantial: one asphalt plant, two concrete batching plants (supply contracts are accepted), one excavator, two front loaders, two asphalt milling machines, two asphalt pavers, four rollers, 20 tipper trucks, 15 concrete mixer trucks, three mechanical sweepers, three bitumen sprayers, two pneumatic-tyred rollers, two shotcrete machines, one sandblasting unit, and one authorised laboratory of the appropriate grade. Certifications. ISO 9001 and ISO 14001 or equivalent, a requirement associated only with the execution of works. Personnel as a qualification requirement. Health and safety officer (SSM) and quality control officer (CQ) only. The remaining specialists — the project manager, the design team coordinator, the roads and bridges design engineer — are not qualification requirements but evaluation factors, which entirely changes the logic of selecting them. Guarantees, deadlines and contractual conditions The procedure is conducted entirely online, through SEAP (the Romanian electronic public procurement system). All documents
M Infra Design & Management is a trusted consultancy firm providing end-to-end solutions for infrastructure development, including civil, industrial, and railway projects.
luni - vineri: 10:00 –
17;00 weekend: închis
© 2025 Infradandb.com. All Rights Reserved.
